Arlen Ward dot com

Scouting, Science, and Sarcasm

Entries Comments



Month: December, 2007

Engineers, systemizing, and Autism

19 December, 2007 (14:54) | Family, Science! | By: Arlen

Last year, an issue of IEEE spectrum had an interesting short article on Engineers and Autism This was particularly interesting in light of the fact that my wife is also an engineer, and we have seen definite signs of systemizing in our son as he plays. Very methodical little bugger, who spends a fair amount of his play time organizing his toys.

The process seems interesting as well:


  1. Certain career areas attract specific types of personalities
  2. Acceptance of both genders into more career areas lead to male and females of similar personality types spending time together
  3. The genetic predisposition for that personalty type is amplified in their offspring
  4. Personality traits taken to extremes lead to disorders

Doomed. My kids are both doomed.

Actually, the youngest is probably really good for him. She doesn’t seem to play into his “systemizing” at all.

Quiz Time! Name all 50 States!

19 December, 2007 (13:38) | Travel | By: Arlen

In 4m 19s
Click here to Play

I would have done better, but apparently I can’t spell Massachusetts or Connecticut.

It is a bit of a cop out that you don’t have to place them on the map too.

Every once in a while you get a peek at how their brains work.

18 December, 2007 (16:57) | Family | By: Arlen

While attending the rosary for my wife’s Great Uncle, some gems came forth from the mouths of babes.

First:
Sign number 34 that your kid doesn’t spend much time in a Catholic Church:

Kid #1 (pointing to the crucifix on the wall): Why did they put that guy on the church-sticks?

Second:
The younger of the two also had observations to work out…
(The following took place in hushed tones while everyone was praying the rosery)
Kid #2: What is that guy [the priest] doing?
Mother: Shhh! We’re praying!
Kid #2: Oh.
Kid #2: [Thinks for a few seconds]
Kid #2: Are we praying for him to get out of the box?
Mother (Rather Surprised): I really hope not.

More Pictures Up in the Gallery…

18 December, 2007 (12:06) | Photography, Site Admin | By: Arlen

I have added some pictures to the gallery from recent outings.

I took some pictures at the church after the decorations went up for the Advent season.
IMG_4367.JPG

The rest of those pictures can be found here, under the South Broadway album.

We also took a trip to the Glass Studio for C & H Glassworks for a glass blowing demonstration.
IMG_4639.jpg
You can find more pictures from the field trip here, also under the South Broadway album.

Oh yeah? Check out MY watch!

12 December, 2007 (23:01) | School, Science! | By: Arlen

Wired has an interesting article on the atomic clocks they are working with at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder.

A part that made me smile, was the description of the Time and Frequency Division’s facilities:

With its fading beige walls and checkered linoleum floors, NIST’s Time and Frequency Division hardly invites a sense of precision. Distracted-looking scientists in slightly rumpled button-downs roam the halls, occasionally sparing a quizzical look for outsiders. Graduate students wander in funny T-shirts, passing offices and labs crammed with manila folders and well-used tools, while cables and pipes zigzag across the ceiling.

That is the exact description for every laboratory space at every university I have ever attended or visited. Seriously, all of them. The University of Colorado (both the Boulder and Denver campuses), Colorado State University, The University of Texas at Austin, and even MIT. It must be some axiom to the often quoted theorem “The worse you look, the smarter they think you are.” but applied to lab space.

The description of their atomic clock also sounds like a grad student’s project:

a jumble of polished lenses and mirrors converging on a gleaming silver cylinder, all protected by a tent of clear plastic nailed to a frame of two-by-fours.

Yup. All they are missing is the aluminum foil, and they’re set!

All facilities observations aside, the article points out some really cool things. The current precision of the clock described above is 10-15 seconds. That is about a thousand-million-millionth of a second. In that amount of time, light travels about 300 nanometers. For comparison, the width of a human hair is about 80,000 nanometers. At that precision, they have to compensate not only for the relativistic effects of the earth’s rotation and orbit and such, but the changes in that velocity by relocating from one floor to another. Mind boggling. And it doesn’t stop there. The system they are currently working on has a target precision of 10-18 seconds. A thousand times more precise.

The are also working on making these super-precise atomic clocks smaller. Not just a little bit, either.

“We’re trying to shrink down … with the whole thing the size of a sugar cube and able to run on AA batteries,” says O’Brian. The most obvious application is making GPS receivers much more accurate, but a tiny atomic clock would have other applications as well.

At the University of Pittsburgh last fall, researchers used a NIST-produced atomic clock the size of a grain of rice to map variations in the magnetic field of a mouse’s heartbeat. They placed the clock 2 mm away from the mouse’s chest, and watched as the mouse’s iron-rich blood threw off the clock’s ticking with every heartbeat.

There is a lot of cool things going on in those cold-war era concrete buildings in Boulder, that is for sure!

Alien Spider Attacks Space Shuttle!!!

11 December, 2007 (21:34) | Science! | By: Arlen

Spider Shuttle

Isn’t that how Starship Troopers started?

I know that most of Kennedy Space Center is a nature preserve, but damn!

via Boing Boing

So everybody else got their hybrid today?

11 December, 2007 (20:51) | Travel, Work | By: Arlen

The other day at work we got a notice that the 2008 IRS rate for mileage reimbursement was being increased to 50.5 cents per mile. For 2007 it was 48.5 cents per mile. Now it is my understanding that this is supposed to cover the cost of operating a vehicle for business purposes. So lets ponder that for a minute.

Let’s assume that there is no increase in maintenance costs for your vehicle (which isn’t true, but makes this a conservative calculation). That leaves changes in the cost of gasoline as the major contributor to the cost hike.

I drive a truck that gets about 16 miles per gallon (MPG). Given the vehicle I drive, and the increase of two cents per mile, this would cover the increase in cost of gasoline to the tune of 32 cents per gallon. But it turns out that in Colorado, the last year saw an increase of 73.8 cents per gallon, according to the Department of Energy. (That number will change weekly, I’m sure)

That means I would have to drive a car that got 36.9 MPG. More than twice what I actually get. So that got me thinking: “What kind of car would I have to drive to have the actual increase in cost covered?”

It turns out that, according to the EPA, for 2008 models, nothing but hybrids will hit 36.9 mpg. In fact, even most of the hybrids miss the mark. Only the hybrid Prius and Accord exceed that MPG rating.

“But wait!”, you say. “These numbers aren’t decided by Colorado! It is for the country as a whole!”

“Good point”, I say. For the US as a whole, it went up only 70.7 cents per gallon. So our meager improvement still only brings the necessary MPG rating to 35.3. That doesn’t change much related to the cars.

It just makes you wonder how they come up with these numbers.

60 RPM

10 December, 2007 (18:30) | Science! | By: Arlen

Hmmm.
Hamster, Hamster Wheel, Tachometer, and Electric Motor? Check!
Burning question that needs to be answered? Check!

I am pretty sure I am going to hell for laughing at this.

Site Update

6 December, 2007 (22:37) | Site Admin | By: Arlen

A little more of my corner of the internet is furnished. I have added all the quasi-legal disclaimers to a page called, believe it or not, disclaimer. You can visit it in all its glory, and take note that it will change in the future, without notice here in the weblog.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled rants and sciency stuff.

The problem with “Novel”

3 December, 2007 (14:13) | School, Work | By: Arlen

Over the course of research related activities, I have had the privilege (duty? requirement?) of reading lots of journal articles. Hundreds of them.

As a result of this, I have one complaint: I hate the word “novel”. Not in the nounish “I wrote a novel” form, but in the adjective-ish “my new technique is novel” form.

I just feel like it is presuming too much. I don’t think the originator of an idea is the proper person to pass judgment on how novel it is. “Unique” is fine, you can tell me it is unique. “Useful” is fine too, though you should probably tell me why it is useful, because useful to you is not necessarily useful to me. “Novel” just strikes me wrong. A little too self-congratulatory.

As far as rants go, this one is pretty minor. But it still bugs me.